Menu
Internet traffic congestion real, but sporadic, study says

Internet traffic congestion real, but sporadic, study says

In some cases, congestion has lasted for months at a time or for most of a day, the study says

Complaints by Netflix and Internet backbone providers about network traffic congestion point to a real problem, with congestion on some networks lasting 18 hours a day, but the problems are sporadic and often temporary, according to preliminary results from a traffic study.

Traffic congestion at interconnection points between broadband providers and backbone providers doesn't appear to be widespread, with congestion often just two or three hours a day, said David Clark, a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and one of the researchers investigating congestion complaints.

But in some cases, US ISPs have experienced periods of congestion on interconnection points with backbone providers that last for months at a time, Clark said. Still, many of the problems of congestion seem to point to disagreements over business arrangements related to mismatches between network capacity and demand, he said during a congressional briefing on traffic congestion.

In recent months, Netflix and backbone providers Cogent and Level 3 have accused US broadband providers of purposefully allowing congestion into their networks as a way to charge Internet video services for carrying their traffic. Last week, US Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler said his agency is looking into the complaints.

The ongoing congestion study, by MIT and the Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis at the University of California's San Diego (UCSD) Supercomputer Center, is preliminary and doesn't assign fault for congestion, but it does point to a poor experience for ISP customers and Netflix, said Clark, involved in the development of the Internet since the 1970s.

Clark didn't call for new FCC regulations, but he said the agency's attention is warranted. "It may be appropriate for the FCC to clear its throat and say, 'what's going on here?'" he said. In some cases, "this has been going on for months."

Representatives of Netflix and the cable broadband industry both said the study supports their positions on who's to blame for the congestion.

The study's results are consistent with ISPs' position that Netflix has routed its traffic through congested interconnection points in order to increase its bargaining power for traffic carriage by ISPs, said Ike Elliot, senior vice president of strategy for CableLabs, a research organization funded by cable broadband providers.

Streaming video providers are "not the victims of manipulated traffic congestion," Elliot said. Instead they have chosen to sent traffic over congested routes "when they had many other options available," he said.

But the study's point that the congestion appears to be the result of business disagreements suggests traffic manipulation, said Ken Florence, vice president of content delivery at Netflix. Traffic graphs showing Netflix congestion on Comcast's network suddenly disappeared when the two company signed a traffic agreement points to Netflix's position that the congestion is "financial, not technical," he said.

While both sides in the debate have an interest in maximizing their profits, the FCC has a role to play in protecting consumers, said Gene Kimmelman, president and CEO of digital rights group Public Knowledge.

The traffic management "can be constantly changed - or manipulated, if you want to call it that - for good business reasons or for maybe a more nefarious exercise of market power, so it calls out for policy oversight," Kimmelman said.

Jeff Eisenach, a visiting scholar at free-market think tank the American Enterprise Institute, suggested a limited need for regulation. If companies on either side of the debate are manipulating traffic unfairly, antitrust agencies have the power to investigate, he said.

MIT and UCSD are looking for ways to collect more data, but in the meantime, streaming video providers and ISPs should look for ways to fix problems of congestion, Clark recommended. Clark said he doubts that ISPs like Comcast want their customers to have a bad experience watching Netflix.

ISPs have huge market power compared to Web content producers, Kimmelman countered. Cable broadband providers may not "want their customers to be unhappy, it just happens to be the case that most of them are," he said. "How can that be the case?"

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.


Follow Us

Join the New Zealand Reseller News newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Level 3telecommunicationregulationJeff EisenachcomcastCogentinternetInternet service providersGene KimmelmanTom WheelerMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyU.S. Federal Communications CommissionIke ElliotgovernmentnetflixKen FlorancebroadbandDavid Clark

Featured

Slideshows

Kiwi channel comes together for another round of After Hours

Kiwi channel comes together for another round of After Hours

The channel came together for another round of After Hours, with a bumper crowd of distributors, vendors and partners descending on The Jefferson in Auckland. Photos by Maria Stefina.​

Kiwi channel comes together for another round of After Hours
Consegna comes to town with AWS cloud offerings launch in Auckland

Consegna comes to town with AWS cloud offerings launch in Auckland

Emerging start-up Consegna has officially launched its cloud offerings in the New Zealand market, through a kick-off event held at Seafarers Building in Auckland.​ Founded in June 2016, the Auckland-based business is backed by AWS and supported by a global team of cloud specialists, leveraging global managed services partnerships with Rackspace locally.

Consegna comes to town with AWS cloud offerings launch in Auckland
Veritas honours top performing trans-Tasman partners

Veritas honours top performing trans-Tasman partners

Veritas honoured its top performing partners across the channel in Australia and New Zealand, recognising innovation and excellence on both sides of the Tasman. Revealed under the Vivid lights in Sydney, Intalock claimed the coveted Partner of the Year 2017 (Pacific) award, with Data#3 acknowledged for 12 months of strong growth across the market. Meanwhile, Datacom took home the New Zealand honours, with Global Storage and Insentra winning service provider and consulting awards respectively. Dicker Data was recognised as the standout distributor of the year, while Hitachi Data Systems claimed the alliance partner award. Photos by Bob Seary.

Veritas honours top performing trans-Tasman partners
Show Comments