Menu
Apple, Samsung bicker over jury verdict form

Apple, Samsung bicker over jury verdict form

As the case approaches its end, the attention of lawyers turns to the questions asked of the jury

As the second jury trial between Apple and Samsung approaches its conclusion, the companies are sparring over the precise questions the jury will be asked to consider.

On Thursday morning, Judge Lucy Koh published a tentative verdict form with 15 questions, each broken into multiple parts. A count through the document reveals 245 decisions and calculations the jury will be asked to make.

For example, a question about whether Samsung infringed Apple's slide-to-unlock patent must be considered for six accused phones and two accused companies -- Samsung Electronics and Samsung Telecommunications America. That's 12 separate decisions for the jury to make.

Each side submitted their own proposed verdict form about three weeks ago, and the judge's tentative form is based on those. It's a lot closer to Apple's proposal than Samsung's, which ran almost double the length of what the judge proposed.

Judge Koh asked for feedback Thursday and it came back fast, with Apple saying the form was too complex and Samsung calling it too simple.

The number of questions the jury has to consider is significant, because as more questions are asked, the more potential there is for problems and objections that could lead to a mistrial.

Apple's objection to the judge's verdict form focused on a question originally proposed by Samsung that asks the jury to break down any damages Samsung should pay not just by product but also by patent.

Apple said the question "substantially increases the risk of a mistrial based on future claims by Samsung that the jury's calculations are inconsistent."

"The jury would need to do additional math to incorporate the per-patent and per-product breakdowns," Apple said, noting neither side provided such a breakdown during the trial.

Apple has good reason to worry about the jury's math: A previous lawsuit between the companies had to be partly retried because the jurors had miscalculated the damages.

Samsung said it wants a more detailed verdict form so it can see how the jury arrives at any damages. Its own proposal would allow for "a more transparent understanding of the jury's damages award, if any," it said.

Judge Koh doesn't have long to rule. The two sides are due back in court Friday, when they will rest their respective cases. Closing statements are set for Monday and the jury will begin its deliberations the same day.

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com


Follow Us

Join the newsletter!

Or
Error: Please check your email address.

Tags smartphonesAppleAndroidlegaliPhoneconsumer electronicsintellectual propertypatentCivil lawsuitsSamsung Electronics

Featured

Slideshows

Bumper channel crowd kicks off first After Hours of 2018

Bumper channel crowd kicks off first After Hours of 2018

After Hours made a welcome return to the channel social calendar with a bumper crowd of partners, distributors and vendors descending on The Jefferson in Auckland to kick-start 2018. Photos by Gino Demeer.

Bumper channel crowd kicks off first After Hours of 2018
Looking back at the top 15 M&A deals in NZ during 2017

Looking back at the top 15 M&A deals in NZ during 2017

In 2017, merger and acquisitions fever reached new heights in New Zealand, with a host of big name deals dominating the headlines. Reseller News recaps the most important transactions of the Kiwi channel during the past 12 months.

Looking back at the top 15 M&A deals in NZ during 2017
Kiwi channel closes 2017 with After Hours

Kiwi channel closes 2017 with After Hours

The channel in New Zealand came together to celebrate the close of 2017, as the final After Hours played out in front of a bumper Auckland crowd.

Kiwi channel closes 2017 with After Hours
Show Comments