Menu
Apple, Samsung bicker over jury verdict form

Apple, Samsung bicker over jury verdict form

As the case approaches its end, the attention of lawyers turns to the questions asked of the jury

As the second jury trial between Apple and Samsung approaches its conclusion, the companies are sparring over the precise questions the jury will be asked to consider.

On Thursday morning, Judge Lucy Koh published a tentative verdict form with 15 questions, each broken into multiple parts. A count through the document reveals 245 decisions and calculations the jury will be asked to make.

For example, a question about whether Samsung infringed Apple's slide-to-unlock patent must be considered for six accused phones and two accused companies -- Samsung Electronics and Samsung Telecommunications America. That's 12 separate decisions for the jury to make.

Each side submitted their own proposed verdict form about three weeks ago, and the judge's tentative form is based on those. It's a lot closer to Apple's proposal than Samsung's, which ran almost double the length of what the judge proposed.

Judge Koh asked for feedback Thursday and it came back fast, with Apple saying the form was too complex and Samsung calling it too simple.

The number of questions the jury has to consider is significant, because as more questions are asked, the more potential there is for problems and objections that could lead to a mistrial.

Apple's objection to the judge's verdict form focused on a question originally proposed by Samsung that asks the jury to break down any damages Samsung should pay not just by product but also by patent.

Apple said the question "substantially increases the risk of a mistrial based on future claims by Samsung that the jury's calculations are inconsistent."

"The jury would need to do additional math to incorporate the per-patent and per-product breakdowns," Apple said, noting neither side provided such a breakdown during the trial.

Apple has good reason to worry about the jury's math: A previous lawsuit between the companies had to be partly retried because the jurors had miscalculated the damages.

Samsung said it wants a more detailed verdict form so it can see how the jury arrives at any damages. Its own proposal would allow for "a more transparent understanding of the jury's damages award, if any," it said.

Judge Koh doesn't have long to rule. The two sides are due back in court Friday, when they will rest their respective cases. Closing statements are set for Monday and the jury will begin its deliberations the same day.

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com


Follow Us

Join the New Zealand Reseller News newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags consumer electronicsintellectual propertysmartphonespatentSamsung ElectronicsCivil lawsuitsiPhonelegalAndroidApple

Featured

Slideshows

Kiwi channel comes together for another round of After Hours

Kiwi channel comes together for another round of After Hours

The channel came together for another round of After Hours, with a bumper crowd of distributors, vendors and partners descending on The Jefferson in Auckland. Photos by Maria Stefina.​

Kiwi channel comes together for another round of After Hours
Consegna comes to town with AWS cloud offerings launch in Auckland

Consegna comes to town with AWS cloud offerings launch in Auckland

Emerging start-up Consegna has officially launched its cloud offerings in the New Zealand market, through a kick-off event held at Seafarers Building in Auckland.​ Founded in June 2016, the Auckland-based business is backed by AWS and supported by a global team of cloud specialists, leveraging global managed services partnerships with Rackspace locally.

Consegna comes to town with AWS cloud offerings launch in Auckland
Veritas honours top performing trans-Tasman partners

Veritas honours top performing trans-Tasman partners

Veritas honoured its top performing partners across the channel in Australia and New Zealand, recognising innovation and excellence on both sides of the Tasman. Revealed under the Vivid lights in Sydney, Intalock claimed the coveted Partner of the Year 2017 (Pacific) award, with Data#3 acknowledged for 12 months of strong growth across the market. Meanwhile, Datacom took home the New Zealand honours, with Global Storage and Insentra winning service provider and consulting awards respectively. Dicker Data was recognised as the standout distributor of the year, while Hitachi Data Systems claimed the alliance partner award. Photos by Bob Seary.

Veritas honours top performing trans-Tasman partners
Show Comments