Menu
Supreme Cout justices question some software patents

Supreme Cout justices question some software patents

Some justices express skepticism about patents involving a trading platform tied to a computer

The U.S. Supreme Court could wipe out a whole swath of software and business-method patents if justices invalidate four electronic-trading patents, an attorney for patent-owner Alice said.

Reviewing an appeals court ruling invalidating electronic marketplace Alice's patents related to a computerized trading platform for currencies, the Supreme Court could, "in one fell swoop" invalidate hundreds of thousands of patents, Carter Phillips, representing Alice, told justices Monday.

Attorneys for CLS Bank, a company that sued Alice to challenge the patents back in 2007, and the U.S. Department of Justice disagreed with Phillips, saying this patent challenge relates specifically to an abstract idea running over a computer. The Supreme Court agreed to take the case after a split U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in May 2013 that an abstract idea is not patentable simply because it is tied to a computer system

The Alice patents cover the simple idea of reconciling accounts at the end of a trading day, or operating a hedge fund, but other software patents bringing new functionality could still be patentable, said Mark Perry, representing CLS Bank.

Judges and patent examiners will have to use judgment to decide what software can be patented, despite the fractured the Federal Circuit wanting firm guidance, Perry said. "It isn't going to be a bright-line rule," he said. "This isn't the death of software patents."

A small percentage of software patents wind up in court, he added. This case, Perry said, is about a group of controversial patents that should have never been issued.

Phillips defended the Alice patents, saying they describe a complex set of instructions used to operate an international trading platform, including shadow accounts used to reconcile trades. The patents cover a "specific way of dealing with a problem," he said.

Justices seemed skeptical of the patents, with Justice Stephen Breyer comparing the Alice process to a money-counter using an abacus in ancient Egypt or his mother taking away his checkbook when he ran out of money.

"What we have different here is the computer stops [trading] rather than the abacus man stopping," Breyer said. "There is an abstract idea here. It's called solvency."

But Breyer also said he was struggling with how to rule because the court's decision could have broad implications on some types of patents or on innovation.

Justice Anthony Kennedy suggested that a small group of engineers in Silicon Valley could write software covering the Alice processes over a weekend. Phillips agreed that may be possible, but suggested that didn't diminish the uniqueness of the invention.

Chief Justice John Roberts countered that the Alice patents appear to describe a complex process, judging by a flow chart that accompanied the patent materials. "There are a lot of arrows ... in different directions," Roberts said.

Perry, echoing the Federal Circuit decision, suggested that if a person can complete a process with a pencil and paper, that process shouldn't be patentable just because it is tied to a computer. But Roberts questioned that argument, suggesting that software can often make a process much simpler.

"What if you can do it without a computer but it's going to take 20 people 100 years?" he said.

Some critics of software patents were encouraged by justices' questions. Based on the questions, it appears likely that the court will invalidate the Alice patents, said Julie Samuels, executive director of Engine Advocacy, a trade group for tech startups.

"I'd be really surprised at the end of the day if these patents are left standing," she said after the hearing.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.


Follow Us

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags governmentlegalsoftwareintellectual propertypatentU.S. Department of JusticeAnthony KennedyU.S. Supreme CourtU.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitStephen BreyerJohn RobertsJulie SamuelsAliceCLS BankEngine AdvocacyCarter PhillipsMark Perry

Featured

Slideshows

Reseller News Platinum Club celebrates leading partners in 2019

Reseller News Platinum Club celebrates leading partners in 2019

The leading players of the New Zealand channel came together to celebrate a year of achievement at the annual Reseller News Platinum Club lunch in Auckland. Following the Reseller News Innovation Awards, Platinum Club provides a platform to showcase the top performing partners and start-ups of the past 12 months.

Reseller News Platinum Club celebrates leading partners in 2019
Reseller News hosts alumnae breakfast for Women in ICT Awards

Reseller News hosts alumnae breakfast for Women in ICT Awards

Reseller News hosted its second annual alumnae breakfast for the Women in ICT Awards in New Zealand, designed to showcase the leading female leaders in the industry. Held at The Cordis in Auckland, attendees came together to hear inspiring keynotes and panel discussions, alongside high-level networking among peers. Photos by Gino Demeer.

Reseller News hosts alumnae breakfast for Women in ICT Awards
Reseller News Innovation Awards 2019: meet the winners

Reseller News Innovation Awards 2019: meet the winners

Reseller News honoured the standout players of the New Zealand channel in front of more than 480 technology leaders in Auckland on 23 October, recognising the achievements of top partners, emerging entrants and innovative start-ups.

Reseller News Innovation Awards 2019: meet the winners
Show Comments