Menu
Contracts with under-aged are high-risk

Contracts with under-aged are high-risk

“Only ever be guarantor for hire purchases for your own kids; because if they don’t pay the loan, you can kick their butts.” I worked my way through university as a salesperson for a big-ticket-item retailer and I will always remember that advice from one of my customers. From law school, I now know it to be good advice. There are a number of cases about things going horribly wrong with finance contracts and young people. But it’s not just parents or guarantors who lose out. In a recent case a finance company lost about $10,000 in unrecovered payments after it gave a car loan to a 17-year-old, but couldn’t enforce the contract when the borrower defaulted.

In New Zealand, a minor is a person who has not yet attained the age of 18 years. We have an act called the Minors Contracts Act 1969 that sets out rules for enforcing contracts against minors: For most contracts, including loan contracts, there is a rule that the contract cannot be enforced against the minor unless the court first gives permission. The court can choose to permit enforcement of the contract only if it is satisfied that the contract was fair and reasonable at the time when it was entered into. However, this is at the court’s discretion, and it can choose to say no.

Who would give a loan to a 17-year-old? A person who made a mistake in the paperwork would. The finance company’s loans officer correctly wrote down the borrower’s date of birth, but then wrongly calculated that person’s age as 18 when he was really only 17. After the loan was made, the borrower missed all of the repayments on the car. The finance company repossessed and sold the car. The sale price wasn’t enough to cover the loan; so the finance company wanted to sue the borrower for the balance.

The finance company had to ask for the court’s permission before it could enforce the contract against the borrower. It had to show that the contract was fair and reasonable. The finance company lost in the District Court, so it appealed to the High Court. The High Court looked at the facts and found that the finance company ought to have known that the borrower was under 18 – it had the correct information in hand. The court also found that a more than cursory check of the borrower would have shown that he was highly unlikely to be able to make repayments because of his low income. In the end, the High Court agreed with the District Court judge’s decision and the finance company was not permitted to take action against the borrower.

Note: employment contracts, called contracts of service in the act, and many life insurance contracts are special cases. There are different rules in the act for those types of contract.

What this case clearly shows is that if you need to enforce a contract against a minor, you are entirely at the mercy of the courts. Even if you have a good case that enforcement would be fair and reasonable, the court might still refuse to let you enforce.

What does this mean in practice? You should never put yourself in a position where you might need to take enforcement action against a minor. It’s a risk that is hardly ever worth taking. And, unlike my friend the retail customer, you don’t even get the pleasure of (metaphorically) kicking anybody’s butt.

Richard Anstice is a staff solicitor in Rae Nield’s office. This article is intended for general information, and should not be relied on as specific legal advice. You should consult a lawyer for advice relating to your own specific legal problems. Rae and Richard can be contacted at raenield@marketinglaw.co.nz.


Follow Us

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Events

Featured

Slideshows

Meet the Reseller News 30 Under 30 Tech Awards 2020 winners

Meet the Reseller News 30 Under 30 Tech Awards 2020 winners

This year’s Reseller News 30 Under 30 Tech Awards were held as an integral part of the first entirely virtual Emerging Leaders​ forum, an annual event dedicated to identifying, educating and showcasing the New Zealand technology market’s rising stars. The 30 Under 30 Tech Awards 2020 recognised the outstanding achievements and business excellence of 30 talented individuals​, across both young leaders and those just starting out. In this slideshow, Reseller News honours this year's winners and captures their thoughts about how their ideas of leadership have changed over time.​

Meet the Reseller News 30 Under 30 Tech Awards 2020 winners
Reseller News Exchange Auckland: Beyond the myths — how partners can master cloud security

Reseller News Exchange Auckland: Beyond the myths — how partners can master cloud security

This exclusive Reseller News Exchange event in Auckland explored the challenges facing the partner community on the cloud security frontier, as well as market trends, customer priorities and how the channel can capitalise on the opportunities available. In association with Arrow, Bitdefender, Exclusive Networks, Fortinet and Palo Alto Networks. Photos by Gino Demeer.

Reseller News Exchange Auckland: Beyond the myths — how partners can master cloud security
Reseller News welcomes industry figures at 2020 Hall of Fame lunch

Reseller News welcomes industry figures at 2020 Hall of Fame lunch

Reseller News welcomed 2019 inductees - Leanne Buer, Ross Jenkins and Terry Dunn - to the fourth running of the Reseller News Hall of Fame lunch, held at the French Cafe in Auckland. The inductees discussed the changing face of the IT channel ecosystem in New Zealand and what it means to be a Reseller News Hall of Fame inductee. Photos by Gino Demeer.

Reseller News welcomes industry figures at 2020 Hall of Fame lunch
Show Comments