Reseller.co.nz stories open for comments
New functionality now live
By Reseller News Staff, Auckland | Thursday, 11 March 2010Readers can now say what they think about stories published on the Reseller News website.
Comments can be made on stories by using the Post a Comment button above the text of the story, whether it's a news story, a feature an opinion piece, a review, or any other type of story.
Readers will also notice a more subtle refresh of the site, where publication dates are shown underneath stories.

Ingram Website * up
No profanities? How will anyone talk about the Ingram website at all?
Its another reason for us all to move to Australia - the Aussie Ingram site is yet to be butchered by the mad redesign.
I actually came to Reseller News today specifically to look for a story on the Ingram disaster. Hopefully they roll it back or at least sell the old interface to a competitor we can then do business with.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:30 on March 11, 2010
No profanities? How will anyone talk about the Ingram website at all?
Its another reason for us all to move to Australia - the Aussie Ingram site is yet to be butchered by the mad redesign.
I actually came to Reseller News today specifically to look for a story on the Ingram disaster. Hopefully they roll it back or at least sell the old interface to a competitor we can then do business with.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:30 on March 11, 2010
Ingram Micro website news story
Ingram Micro website news story: http://bit.ly/cKk6kf
Posted by Amanda Sachtleben at 11:59 on March 11, 2010
Ingram Micro website news story: http://bit.ly/cKk6kf
Posted by Amanda Sachtleben at 11:59 on March 11, 2010
Ingram Micro website news story
So how about an updated story? That was 10 days ago. The functionality is still as screwed up as it was on the day it was launched.
It may be faster now than 10 days ago, but it is still ten times slower than the old website.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:38 on March 12, 2010
So how about an updated story? That was 10 days ago. The functionality is still as screwed up as it was on the day it was launched.
It may be faster now than 10 days ago, but it is still ten times slower than the old website.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:38 on March 12, 2010
Ingram Web site
I surprised you haven't written a book onthe dog. They must be paying far too much in adsvertising fees.
Posted by Anonymous at 11:22 on March 11, 2010
I surprised you haven't written a book onthe dog. They must be paying far too much in adsvertising fees.
Posted by Anonymous at 11:22 on March 11, 2010
Ingram Micro website
So when are you going to run a story about the botched "upgrade" of the Ingram Micro website?
Posted by Anonymous at 11:19 on March 11, 2010
So when are you going to run a story about the botched "upgrade" of the Ingram Micro website?
Posted by Anonymous at 11:19 on March 11, 2010
Say what we think!
A good step forwards, and you are to be commended. Hopefully journalistic integrity will not be diluted by ill-informed comment, but I have sometimes read a piece and thought - hang on, that's not quite right, I wish I could react to this.
Presumably you will be moderating for profanities?
Posted by Terence Fleming at 11:08 on March 11, 2010
A good step forwards, and you are to be commended. Hopefully journalistic integrity will not be diluted by ill-informed comment, but I have sometimes read a piece and thought - hang on, that's not quite right, I wish I could react to this.
Presumably you will be moderating for profanities?
Posted by Terence Fleming at 11:08 on March 11, 2010
Reply: Say what we think!
Thanks Terence
Yes the comments will be moderated.
Posted by Amanda Sachtleben at 11:54 on March 11, 2010
Thanks Terence
Yes the comments will be moderated.
Posted by Amanda Sachtleben at 11:54 on March 11, 2010
Reply: Say what we think!
Not very well though, considering there is now 10 pages of SPAM as at 10.49pm Sunday. I guess you'll delete them tomorrow...
Posted by Anonymous at 22:49 on March 14, 2010
Not very well though, considering there is now 10 pages of SPAM as at 10.49pm Sunday. I guess you'll delete them tomorrow...
Posted by Anonymous at 22:49 on March 14, 2010






Just read the story referenced in the first comment, which talks about Ingram trying to improve the site's stability.
We'd accept it being under half as stable if they could only make it more than twice as useable. Oh wait, twice nothing is still nothing.
The sad thing is, they had something that worked well...
Posted by Anonymous at 17:36 on March 11, 2010
Flag abuse