Menu
Google, Facebook and peers criticize CISA bill ahead of Senate consideration

Google, Facebook and peers criticize CISA bill ahead of Senate consideration

The US legislation would allow government agencies and companies to share cyberthreat data

A trade group representing Facebook, Google, Yahoo and other tech and communications companies has come down heavily against the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, a controversial bill in the U.S. that is intended to encourage businesses to share information about cyberthreats with the government.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association claims that the mechanism CISA prescribes for the sharing of cyberthreat information does not adequately protect users’ privacy or put an appropriate limit on the permissible uses of information shared with the government.

The bill, in addition, "authorizes entities to employ network defense measures that might cause collateral harm to the systems of innocent third parties," the CCIA said in a blog post Thursday.

CISA, which would give businesses immunity from customer lawsuits when they share cyberthreat data with the government, is due for consideration by the U.S. Senate in the coming weeks.

Critics of the bill are concerned that the provisions of the bill could be used by companies to hand over customers’ personal data to government intelligence agencies such as the National Security Agency. Cyberthreat information-sharing may not have prevented several recent attacks on government agencies, according to experts.

Civil rights groups opposed to the bill got an unexpected ally in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which warned in July about the privacy implications of the bill.

The authorization in CISA to share cyberthreat data with any federal agency, notwithstanding any other provision of law, could impact key privacy provisions, including those in the Stored Communications Act that limit the disclosure of the content of electronic communications to the government by providers, wrote Alejandro N. Mayorkas, deputy secretary of the DHS in a letter to Senator Al Franken, a Democrat from Minnesota, who opposes the legislation.

DHS also warned that the proposed information sharing system with multiple agencies would slow down responses to a cyberthreat, and advocated a more centralized mechanism for sharing data through the National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC), a non-law enforcement, non-intelligence center focused on network defense activities, that would scrub private information from the data before sending it to other agencies.

The tech industry holds that current rules already permit companies to share cyberthreat indicators with the government, and "should not be discounted as useful existing mechanisms." CCIA approves of the goal of building a more robust mechanism for information sharing, but does not want it to come at the expense of user privacy.

A privacy group last month started an online protest, called YouBetrayedUs, after a letter by the BSA | The Software Alliance of software vendors to Congress appeared to endorse CISA. The letter had urged action by the House of Representatives and the Senate on five pending legislative efforts, including CISA, but BSA later clarified that it had not endorsed any specific legislation in its current form. “The letter clearly was a mistake and doesn’t imply CISA support. We need to clarify. I’m against it,” Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce.com said in a tweet.

Follow Us

Join the New Zealand Reseller News newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Featured

Slideshows

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

​As the channel changes and industry voices deepen, the need for clarity and insight heightens. Market misconceptions talk of an “under pressure” distribution space, with competitors in that fateful “race for relevance” across New Zealand. Amidst the cliched assumptions however, distribution is once again showing its strength, as a force to be listened to, rather than questioned. Traditionally, the role was born out of a need for vendors and resellers to find one another, acting as a bridge between the testing lab and the marketplace. Yet despite new technologies and business approaches shaking the channel to its very core, distributors remain tied to the epicentre - providing the voice of reason amidst a seismic industry shift. In looking across both sides of the vendor and partner fences, the middle concept of the three-tier chain remains centrally placed to understand the metrics of two differing worlds, as the continual pulse checkers of the local channel. This exclusive Reseller News Roundtable, in association with Dicker Data and rhipe, examined the pivotal role of distribution in understanding the health of the channel, educating from the epicentre as the market transforms at a rapid rate.

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel
Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

After Hours made a welcome return to the channel social calendar last night, with a bumper crowd of distributors, vendors and resellers descending on The Jefferson in Auckland to kickstart 2017. Photos by Maria Stefina.

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017
Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow Electronics introduced Tenable Network Security to local resellers in Sydney last week, officially launching the distributor's latest security partnership across Australia and New Zealand. Representing the first direct distribution agreement locally for Tenable specifically, the deal sees Arrow deliver security solutions directly to mid-market and enterprise channel partners on both sides of the Tasman.

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel
Show Comments