Menu
HP tells cybersecurity customers to focus on people and processes

HP tells cybersecurity customers to focus on people and processes

Organizations put too much emphasis on new technology

To protect themselves against cyberattacks, organisations should focus more on training their employees and improving their internal processes instead of buying new technology, according to one tech vendor.

Yet, businesses and government agencies often focus on the next "silver bullet" product, unaware that most cybersecurity problems stem from flawed procedures and human error, said Art Gilliland, senior vice president and general manager for Hewlett-Packard's software enterprise security products.

"This is hard for a product guy to say out loud to an audience, but invest in your people and process," Gilliland said at HP's Software Government Summit in Washington, D.C. "The first thing that always gets negotiated out of every [security software] contract is the training and the services."

Another mistake organizations make is spending a huge portion of their cybersecurity budgets on traditional perimeter defense products like firewalls and antivirus products, while short-changing tools to detect and stop attackers after they break into the systems, at which point "they pretty much own us," Gilliland added.

While organisations shouldn't ignore perimeter defense, they should also invest in systems that detect attackers inside networks and in encryption to protect important data, he said.

Gilliland and Keith Alexander, the former director of the U.S. National Security Agency, both called for U.S. businesses and government agencies to share more cyberthreat information with each other.

Congress in recent years has attempted to pass legislation that would encourage cyberthreat information sharing by offering lawsuit protections for companies, but the bills have been bogged down over concerns about consumer privacy and the type of information companies would share.

Cyberthreat information sharing is one of the few ways organizations can be "proactive" in dealing with cyberattacks, Gilliland said. The concern about consumer privacy may not be as big of an issue when the sharing is among government agencies as when there are private businesses involved. But there's still much work to do related to technology standards and automating the sharing of information, he said later in an interview.

Organizations looking to share cyberthreat information should start small with noncontroversial data to avoid the privacy concerns and build from there, he recommended.

Congress needs to pass legislation to encourage cyberthreat information sharing, added Alexander, who co-founded IronNet Cybersecurity after leaving the NSA.

"Despite what people say, NSA, Cyber Command, the FBI and Homeland Security cannot see somebody attacking Sony unless we're told," said Alexander, who also spoke at the HP event. "It has to be real-time [sharing]. If we don't have real-time between government and industry, we're not going to solve anything."

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Follow Us

Join the New Zealand Reseller News newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Government use of ITsecurityIronNet CybersecurityKeith AlexanderU.S. National Security AgencyArt GillilandgovernmentHewlett-Packard

Featured

Slideshows

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

​As the channel changes and industry voices deepen, the need for clarity and insight heightens. Market misconceptions talk of an “under pressure” distribution space, with competitors in that fateful “race for relevance” across New Zealand. Amidst the cliched assumptions however, distribution is once again showing its strength, as a force to be listened to, rather than questioned. Traditionally, the role was born out of a need for vendors and resellers to find one another, acting as a bridge between the testing lab and the marketplace. Yet despite new technologies and business approaches shaking the channel to its very core, distributors remain tied to the epicentre - providing the voice of reason amidst a seismic industry shift. In looking across both sides of the vendor and partner fences, the middle concept of the three-tier chain remains centrally placed to understand the metrics of two differing worlds, as the continual pulse checkers of the local channel. This exclusive Reseller News Roundtable, in association with Dicker Data and rhipe, examined the pivotal role of distribution in understanding the health of the channel, educating from the epicentre as the market transforms at a rapid rate.

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel
Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

After Hours made a welcome return to the channel social calendar last night, with a bumper crowd of distributors, vendors and resellers descending on The Jefferson in Auckland to kickstart 2017. Photos by Maria Stefina.

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017
Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow Electronics introduced Tenable Network Security to local resellers in Sydney last week, officially launching the distributor's latest security partnership across Australia and New Zealand. Representing the first direct distribution agreement locally for Tenable specifically, the deal sees Arrow deliver security solutions directly to mid-market and enterprise channel partners on both sides of the Tasman.

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel
Show Comments