Menu
US FTC will target patent trolls, commissioner says

US FTC will target patent trolls, commissioner says

The agency, even while studying patent assertion entities, can take action against unfair practices, Brill says

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission can take action against patent trolls when the patent-holding firms engage in unfair business practices, even as the agency works to complete a study on their business model, a commissioner said.

The FTC plans to complete its ongoing study of patent licensing firms -- often called patent assertion entities (PAEs) or patent trolls -- within the next year, FTC Commissioner Julie Brill said Wednesday. In the meantime, the agency should target its enforcement power toward PAEs when they unfairly threaten patent infringement lawsuits, Brill said during a forum on PAEs.

Even before the FTC's study is completed, there's room for the FTC to enforce the law barring unfair business practices and for the U.S. Congress to pass new laws limiting some PAE practices, Brill said.

"Further reforms to the patent litigation system are clearly warranted to make it more difficult for PAEs and others that seek to profit by bringing, and threatening to bring, frivolous patent infringement lawsuits," Brill said.

Several large tech firms and digital rights groups have called on Congress to pass patent reform legislation focused on discouraging PAEs, after recent studies have suggested that these patent-holding businesses account for more than half of all patent infringement lawsuits filed in the U.S. in recent years.

Other trade groups have questioned the impact of PAEs on the U.S. patent system. Earlier this month, speakers at conservative lawyers group the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies questioned whether PAEs are causing serious problems and suggested that recent patent reform legislation could erode intellectual property rights.

A year ago, the House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act, a bill targeting patent trolls, but similar legislation stalled in the Senate.

Hours before Brill's speech, groups including the Innovation Alliance, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and the Medical Device Manufacturers Association, sent a letter to congressional leaders saying the Innovation Act isn't needed after recent Supreme Court decisions related to patents and enforcement action by the FTC.

"We will continue to strongly oppose legislation that would weaken the overall patent system and thereby diminish innovation and job creation in the United States," the letter said. "As a result of these developments, we are even more concerned that some of the measures under consideration over the past year go far beyond what is necessary or desirable to combat abusive litigation."

Brill on Wednesday endorsed some provisions of the Innovation Act, saying Congress would require companies filing patent infringement complaints to include specific allegations of infringing behavior, instead of the often "bare-bones" documents filed at the start of lawsuits. She also called on Congress to give courts more authority to award attorney's fees and discovery costs to defendants in questionable patent infringement lawsuits.

"There's no need to wait for the completion of [the FTC's] study to act on these and other key legislative patent reform proposals," Brill said. "Various provisions in the bills will most certainly discourage frivolous lawsuits and improve patent quality, actions that I believe are needed now."

In the meantime, the FTC, the U.S. Department of Justice and state attorneys general can move to "stop inappropriate PAE abuse," Brill said.

The FTC, in November, announced a complaint and a settlement with MPHJ Technology Investments, a company that the agency accused of sending more than 9,000 patent licensing demand letters to about 4,800 small businesses between September 2012 and June 2013.

MPHJ had purchased patents for what Brill called "widely used computer scanning equipment," and threatened lawsuits against the small businesses unless they paid a licensing fee. But the company had "no intention to initiate lawsuits," Brill said, and the FTC charged MPHJ with violating a U.S. unfair business practices statute.

The New York Attorney General's Office also reached a settlement with MPHJ, back in January.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Follow Us

Join the New Zealand Reseller News newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags U.S. Federal Trade CommissionMPHJ Technology InvestmentsFederalist Society for Law and Public Policy StudiesJulie Brillintellectual propertyregulationU.S. House of Representativespatentlegalgovernment

Featured

Slideshows

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

​As the channel changes and industry voices deepen, the need for clarity and insight heightens. Market misconceptions talk of an “under pressure” distribution space, with competitors in that fateful “race for relevance” across New Zealand. Amidst the cliched assumptions however, distribution is once again showing its strength, as a force to be listened to, rather than questioned. Traditionally, the role was born out of a need for vendors and resellers to find one another, acting as a bridge between the testing lab and the marketplace. Yet despite new technologies and business approaches shaking the channel to its very core, distributors remain tied to the epicentre - providing the voice of reason amidst a seismic industry shift. In looking across both sides of the vendor and partner fences, the middle concept of the three-tier chain remains centrally placed to understand the metrics of two differing worlds, as the continual pulse checkers of the local channel. This exclusive Reseller News Roundtable, in association with Dicker Data and rhipe, examined the pivotal role of distribution in understanding the health of the channel, educating from the epicentre as the market transforms at a rapid rate.

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel
Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

After Hours made a welcome return to the channel social calendar last night, with a bumper crowd of distributors, vendors and resellers descending on The Jefferson in Auckland to kickstart 2017. Photos by Maria Stefina.

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017
Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow Electronics introduced Tenable Network Security to local resellers in Sydney last week, officially launching the distributor's latest security partnership across Australia and New Zealand. Representing the first direct distribution agreement locally for Tenable specifically, the deal sees Arrow deliver security solutions directly to mid-market and enterprise channel partners on both sides of the Tasman.

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel
Show Comments