Menu
Digital rights groups ask ITU to stay out of net neutrality debate

Digital rights groups ask ITU to stay out of net neutrality debate

The U.N. agency should resist calls to regulation international termination fees for Web traffic, the groups say

The International Telecommunication Union should resist calls to adopt rules allowing countries to charge fees for Internet traffic coming from outside their borders, said 21 digital rights groups from 11 countries.

If the ITU moves to allow telecom-style termination fees for Web traffic, the United Nations agency could damage Internet openness and threaten net neutrality, said Danielle Kehlm, a policy analyst at the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute. The institute is one of the groups signing a set of recommendations to the ITU as it hosts its 2014 Plenipotentiary Conference in South Korea through Nov. 7.

Some developing nations pushed for global standards allowing Internet termination fees -- charges for carrying traffic from outside the country to end customers -- in an effort to raise money for broadband deployment, at the ITU's 2012 World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT). The issue is expected to come up again at this year's ITU conference, Kehlm said.

The ITU should focus on Internet access and deployment issues, where it has U.N. mandates, instead of public policy issues, Kehlm said. "Internet public policy should not be something the ITU is determining," she said.

Under the heading of "International connection and net neutrality," the recommendations from the digital rights groups suggest other ways to pay for broadband deployment. The digital rights groups share concerns about the cost of deployment, the document said.

"The high cost of international connectivity is being dealt with through a range of measures, including competition, enabling environments and investment, increased traffic demand and reduced costs," as well as work being done at the ITU to provide incentives for Internet investment, the document said.

Meanwhile, there's disagreement among countries about interconnection of Internet traffic and termination fees, the document noted. Interconnection "remains an unsettled issue with no broadly accepted set of standards to govern international settlement," the document said. "Currently, individual countries have the authority to regulate IP interconnection rates as needed, and this remains the optimal approach in such a dynamic and evolving market."

Taking into account ongoing concerns about the transparency of the ITU's decision-making process, the agency should stay out of major policy debates, said Shiva Stella, communications manager at Public Knowledge (PK), one of the groups signing onto the recommendations.

"Non-democratic states should not be allowed to make Internet policy behind closed doors, where public interest groups, academics and representatives of the people can not impact the ITU's decision-making process or have access to the ITU's documents to share with the public," she said by email. "PK prefers for net neutrality decisions impacting the United States to occur at the Federal Communications Commission, where U.S. citizens have the opportunity to both access the information being evaluated and make their opinions heard."

Concerns about cybersecurity also came up during WCIT, with some nations pushing for the ITU to adopt resolutions that would allow them to take new steps to target Internet users as a way to combat cyberthreats. Critics of those proposals, including the U.S. government, dismissed them as vague attempts to expand censorship.

The digital rights groups, in their recommendations, said attempts at the ITU meeting to develop an international cybersecurity treaty would be "premature." Among ITU member nations, there's a "lack of consensus on key issues," the document said, including a definition of the proper use of force in cyberspace.

Any cybersecurity discussions "should be grounded in human rights principles," the groups wrote.

Anticipating discussion at the ITU conference on counterfeit electronic devices, the groups also said the agency should not take steps toward prohibiting counterfeit devices from connecting to the Internet. Trade controls can better address issues with counterfeiting, they said.

Denying service to users "would be an extremely disproportionate response to the relatively minor network irregularities that may be caused by counterfeit devices," the groups wrote. "Furthermore, it will mostly affect the poorest people, since counterfeit devices are attractive for this group because of their competitive pricing."

An ITU spokeswoman wasn't immediately available to comment on the recommendations.

Among the other groups signing the recommendations were the Center for Democracy and Technology, Movimento Mega, Global Partners Digital and the World Wide Web Foundation.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Follow Us

Join the New Zealand Reseller News newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags New America FoundationGlobal Partners DigitalMovimento MegaCenter for Democracy and TechnologyWorld Wide Web FoundationgovernmentInternational Telecommunication UnioninternetPublic KnowledgeShiva StellaDanielle Kehlm

Featured

Slideshows

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

​As the channel changes and industry voices deepen, the need for clarity and insight heightens. Market misconceptions talk of an “under pressure” distribution space, with competitors in that fateful “race for relevance” across New Zealand. Amidst the cliched assumptions however, distribution is once again showing its strength, as a force to be listened to, rather than questioned. Traditionally, the role was born out of a need for vendors and resellers to find one another, acting as a bridge between the testing lab and the marketplace. Yet despite new technologies and business approaches shaking the channel to its very core, distributors remain tied to the epicentre - providing the voice of reason amidst a seismic industry shift. In looking across both sides of the vendor and partner fences, the middle concept of the three-tier chain remains centrally placed to understand the metrics of two differing worlds, as the continual pulse checkers of the local channel. This exclusive Reseller News Roundtable, in association with Dicker Data and rhipe, examined the pivotal role of distribution in understanding the health of the channel, educating from the epicentre as the market transforms at a rapid rate.

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel
Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

After Hours made a welcome return to the channel social calendar last night, with a bumper crowd of distributors, vendors and resellers descending on The Jefferson in Auckland to kickstart 2017. Photos by Maria Stefina.

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017
Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow Electronics introduced Tenable Network Security to local resellers in Sydney last week, officially launching the distributor's latest security partnership across Australia and New Zealand. Representing the first direct distribution agreement locally for Tenable specifically, the deal sees Arrow deliver security solutions directly to mid-market and enterprise channel partners on both sides of the Tasman.

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel
Show Comments