Menu
DOJ files gov't contracting lawsuit against CA

DOJ files gov't contracting lawsuit against CA

CA 'knowingly overcharged' the US government for software licenses and maintenance, the DOJ says

Tech vendor CA has overcharged U.S. government agencies for software licenses and maintenance since 2006, according to a lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice Thursday.

The DOJ's lawsuit, alleging that CA violated the False Claims Act in connection with a U.S. General Services Administration contract, echoes similar lawsuits filed against several tech vendors in recent years.

CA, which has had a GSA contract since 2002, "knowingly overcharged" the U.S. government for software licenses and maintenance in various ways, the DOJ said in a press release.

CA denied the charges. "We believe that the material aspects of the government's liability theories are unfounded and will vigorously contest them," the company said in a statement.

The company is hopeful for a quick resolution, CA added. "We've had numerous discussions with the government and continue to believe that dialogue in good faith will lead to a satisfactory outcome for both parties," the company's statement said.

CA provided incomplete and inaccurate information to GSA contracting officers during the negotiation of contract extensions, despite being required to disclose its commercial contracting practices, the DOJ alleged. The disclosure is required to give GSA information needed to negotiate a fair price for government agencies, DOJ said.

CA also failed to update its discounting practices during the life of the GSA contract, the DOJ alleged. CA repeatedly certified to GSA that its discounting policies and practices had not changed, when it was offering larger discounts to commercial customers, the agency alleged.

The DOJ's complaint also alleges that, since 2002, CA failed to properly apply the GSA contract's price reduction clause. The contract required CA to monitor discounts to certain commercial customers, compare these discounts to the discounts given to the government and, if the commercial discounts were higher, pass on those higher discounts to the government, the DOJ said.

CA failed to make those comparisons, and when it did, failed to do so correctly, the DOJ alleged.

"We expect companies that do business with the government to comply with their contractual obligations," Stuart Delery, assistant attorney general in the DOJ's Civil Division, said in a statement. "As this case demonstrates, we will take action against those who seek to abuse the government's procurement process."

Some of the allegations in the DOJ's complaint came from a 2009 lawsuit brought by Dani Shemesh, a former employee of CA Israel, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act. The provisions permit whistleblowers to sue on behalf of the government and to share the recovery.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Follow Us

Join the New Zealand Reseller News newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags caU.S. Department of JusticeDani ShemeshCivil lawsuitslegalU.S. General Services AdministrationgovernmentStuart Delery

Featured

Slideshows

Reseller News launches inaugural Hall of Fame lunch

Reseller News launches inaugural Hall of Fame lunch

Reseller News welcomed 2015 and 2016 inductees - Darryl Swann, Dave Rosenberg, Gary Bigwood, Keith Watson, Mike Hill and Scott Green - to the inaugural Reseller News Hall of Fame lunch, held at the French Cafe in Auckland. The inductees discussed how the channel can collectively work together to benefit New Zealand, the Kiwi skills shortage and the future of the industry. Photos by Maria Stefina.

Reseller News launches inaugural Hall of Fame lunch
Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

​As the channel changes and industry voices deepen, the need for clarity and insight heightens. Market misconceptions talk of an “under pressure” distribution space, with competitors in that fateful “race for relevance” across New Zealand. Amidst the cliched assumptions however, distribution is once again showing its strength, as a force to be listened to, rather than questioned. Traditionally, the role was born out of a need for vendors and resellers to find one another, acting as a bridge between the testing lab and the marketplace. Yet despite new technologies and business approaches shaking the channel to its very core, distributors remain tied to the epicentre - providing the voice of reason amidst a seismic industry shift. In looking across both sides of the vendor and partner fences, the middle concept of the three-tier chain remains centrally placed to understand the metrics of two differing worlds, as the continual pulse checkers of the local channel. This exclusive Reseller News Roundtable, in association with Dicker Data and rhipe, examined the pivotal role of distribution in understanding the health of the channel, educating from the epicentre as the market transforms at a rapid rate.

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel
Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

After Hours made a welcome return to the channel social calendar last night, with a bumper crowd of distributors, vendors and resellers descending on The Jefferson in Auckland to kickstart 2017. Photos by Maria Stefina.

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017
Show Comments