Menu
Senator vows fierce defense of NSA data collection, surveillance programs

Senator vows fierce defense of NSA data collection, surveillance programs

The NSA's telephone records collection program is necessary to keep the U.S. safe from terrorism, some lawmakers say

Massive data collection and surveillance programs at the U.S. National Security Agency are necessary to keep the nation safe from terrorism, several senators said Wednesday.

While some members of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for changes in NSA surveillance programs that would end the bulk collection of U.S. telephone records, others defended the program and a second surveillance program focused on email communications of people outside the U.S.

Ending the collection of telephone metadata in the U.S. would make the U.S. more vulnerable to a 9/11-style terrorist attack, said Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat and chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The NSA's collection of U.S. telephone call information is legal and necessary, she said at a Judiciary Committee hearing.

"Our great strength today, ladies and gentlemen, in protecting this homeland is to be able to have the kind of technology that's able to piece together data while protecting rights," Feinstein said. "I will do everything I can to prevent this program from being cancelled out."

The telephone metadata collection program is not a surveillance program, as widely reported in the media from leaks by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, according to Feinstein. "There is no [call] content collected by the NSA," she said.

If the telephone records program had been in operation in 2001, there would have been a "very high" likelihood that authorities would have discovered the 9/11 plot before it happened, said General Keith Alexander, the NSA's director.

Several other senators defended the NSA programs, as well as Alexander and James Clapper, U.S. director of national intelligence. "Both of you are trying to do things right to protect our nation," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican.

Other senators called for several changes to the NSA's programs. Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat and Judiciary Committee chairman, said he will push for legislation that would end the NSA's bulk collection of U.S. phone records. Leahy is lead sponsor of the FISA Accountability and Privacy Protection Act.

"There have to be limits on the surveillance powers we give to the government," Leahy said. "Just because something is technologically possible, and just because something may be deemed technically legal, does not mean that it's the right thing to do."

The bulk collection of U.S. phone records is illegal because it is not related to criminal activity, said Laura Donohue, director of Georgetown University's Center on National Security and the Law. The program is overly "broad, nonspecific, forward-looking, not tied to a crime and looks to anticipate future acts," she said.

But Clapper said President Barack Obama's administration would oppose legislation that would simply allow Internet companies to report the number of surveillance requests they receive from the NSA and other agencies. Allowing companies to report the numbers of surveillance requests they individually receive would drive terrorists to services not covered by NSA surveillance, he said.

Clapper was prepared to read a statement about a secret NSA pilot program in 2010 and 2011 that would have allowed the agency to collect bulk data about U.S. mobile phone locations, according to a story in The New York Times. But senators didn't ask Clapper about the program, and he didn't volunteer the information during the hearing.

Alexander told the Senate Intelligence Committee last week that the NSA had no plans to collect mobile-phone location information, but he also didn't talk about the pilot program at that hearing.

Alexander also disputed a recent report in The New York Times saying the NSA is tracking social networks to build graphs of the social connections of U.S. residents. The NSA does track social networks to gather information on foreign terrorism suspects, but the report that the NSA was doing the same thing with U.S. residents' social-network data was "flat-out wrong," he said.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Follow Us

Join the New Zealand Reseller News newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags U.S. Senate Intelligence CommitteetelecommunicationKeith AlexanderDianne FeinsteinU.S. National Security AgencyJames ClapperU.S. Senate Judiciary CommitteelegislationinternetprivacyLindsey GrahamGeorgetown UniversitysecurityEdward SnowdengovernmentLaura DonohuePatrick Leahy

Featured

Slideshows

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel

​As the channel changes and industry voices deepen, the need for clarity and insight heightens. Market misconceptions talk of an “under pressure” distribution space, with competitors in that fateful “race for relevance” across New Zealand. Amidst the cliched assumptions however, distribution is once again showing its strength, as a force to be listened to, rather than questioned. Traditionally, the role was born out of a need for vendors and resellers to find one another, acting as a bridge between the testing lab and the marketplace. Yet despite new technologies and business approaches shaking the channel to its very core, distributors remain tied to the epicentre - providing the voice of reason amidst a seismic industry shift. In looking across both sides of the vendor and partner fences, the middle concept of the three-tier chain remains centrally placed to understand the metrics of two differing worlds, as the continual pulse checkers of the local channel. This exclusive Reseller News Roundtable, in association with Dicker Data and rhipe, examined the pivotal role of distribution in understanding the health of the channel, educating from the epicentre as the market transforms at a rapid rate.

Educating from the epicentre - Why distributors are the pulse checkers of the channel
Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017

After Hours made a welcome return to the channel social calendar last night, with a bumper crowd of distributors, vendors and resellers descending on The Jefferson in Auckland to kickstart 2017. Photos by Maria Stefina.

Kiwi channel reunites as After Hours kicks off 2017
Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel

Arrow Electronics introduced Tenable Network Security to local resellers in Sydney last week, officially launching the distributor's latest security partnership across Australia and New Zealand. Representing the first direct distribution agreement locally for Tenable specifically, the deal sees Arrow deliver security solutions directly to mid-market and enterprise channel partners on both sides of the Tasman.

Arrow exclusively introduces Tenable Network Security to A/NZ channel
Show Comments